[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111206220620.GF14154@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 23:06:20 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To: Wolfgang Denk <wd@...x.de>
Cc: Heiko Schocher <hs@...x.de>, Vitaly Bordug <vbordug@...mvista.com>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers, char: add U-Boot bootcount driver
> > bootcount itself is not a device. It is a feature of certain devices. And that
> > needs to be implemented; possibly generic enough that it can work for register
> > based, i2c based, and so forth, accesses.
>
> If "boot counter" is not a good name for such a device, then what name
> would you suggest?
None.
> Or do you think a counter (which can be implemented in a number of
> different ways, depending on hardware specifics) is not a device?
Yes.
> What would be such a device, then?
"maxim,ds1338"
Please have a look at the devicetree.org-wiki-page I just mentioned:
http://devicetree.org/Device_Tree_Usage
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists