[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EDD5D77.3030101@numascale.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:10:31 +0100
From: Steffen Persvold <sp@...ascale.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
daniel@...ascale-asia.com, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/apic] x86: Add NumaChip support
On 12/5/2011 21:31, Ingo Molnar wrote:
[]
> There's a new build failure caused by this commit:
It's this commit actually :
Commit-ID: 64be4c1c2428e148de6081af235e2418e6a66dda
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/64be4c1c2428e148de6081af235e2418e6a66dda
Author: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ascale-asia.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 16:20:37 +0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 17:17:21 +0100
x86: Add x86_init platform override to fix up NUMA core numbering
>
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:1149:2: error: ‘struct cpuinfo_x86’ has no member named ‘phys_proc_id’
>
> Note that the config is a !SMP one - that's probably the key
> detail.
Yes, phys_proc_id in struct cpuinfo_x86 is covered within "ifdef CONFIG_SMP".
>
> Please send a delta fix that resolves this bug. You can find the
> current lineup in:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
>
Will do, should be fairly simple. Something in the lines of the attached should work (tested).
Note: I used "ifdef CONFIG_NUMA" simply because it doesn't make sense in a non-numa configuration even with SMP enabled. Besides, the only place where it is called right now is in kernel/cpu/amd.c:srat_detect_node() within the "CONFIG_NUMA" protected part.
Cheers,
--
Steffen Persvold, Chief Architect NumaChip
Numascale AS - www.numascale.com
Tel: +47 92 49 25 54 Skype: spersvold
View attachment "0002-x86_init-core-numbering-delta.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (453 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists