[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1112052310160.2357@xanadu.home>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 23:11:03 -0500 (EST)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the memblock tree with the arm
tree
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
>
> [Tejun, I know you told me about these, but I am reporting them anyway
> just for completeness.]
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the memblock tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mm/init.c between commit 27a3f0e91bed ("ARM: sort the meminfo
> array earlier") from the arm tree and commit 0dac7e2d90aa ("memblock:
> Kill memblock_init()") from the memblock tree.
>
> Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.
The fix looks trivially correct.
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
>
> diff --cc arch/arm/mm/init.c
> index 786addd,7c38474..0000000
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
> @@@ -310,7 -331,8 +311,6 @@@ void __init arm_memblock_init(struct me
> {
> int i;
>
> - memblock_init();
> - sort(&meminfo.bank, meminfo.nr_banks, sizeof(meminfo.bank[0]), meminfo_cmp, NULL);
> -
> for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_banks; i++)
> memblock_add(mi->bank[i].start, mi->bank[i].size);
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists