[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111207155435.GB23845@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 17:54:35 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>
Cc: Virtualization List <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, levinsasha928@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/12] virtio: console: Add freeze and restore
handlers to support S4
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 04:29:55PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Wed) 07 Dec 2011 [12:43:24], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> > > diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> > > index e14f5aa..fd2fd6f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> > > @@ -1844,6 +1844,60 @@ static unsigned int features[] = {
> > > VIRTIO_CONSOLE_F_MULTIPORT,
> > > };
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > > +static int virtcons_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > +{
> > > + struct ports_device *portdev;
> > > + struct port *port;
> > > +
> > > + portdev = vdev->priv;
> > > +
> > > + vdev->config->reset(vdev);
> >
> >
> > So here, cancel_work_sync might still be running.
> > If it does run, might it try to access the device
> > config? Could not determine this quickly, if yes it's a problem.
>
> Similar to the other comment: I don't see why just resetting device
> can cause config queue access to go bad.
>
> Amit
Hmm, not sure anymore. Sorry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists