linux-kernel - Re: Perhaps a side effect regarding NMI returns

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFzvGcVRDdm82OdjwP-D-fnrgTVFekVVVKYZSbsexGhN-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 7 Dec 2011 08:44:50 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Perhaps a side effect regarding NMI returns

On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> I've tested this patch quite a bit with 'perf top -C 1000' and it holds
> up well. Could you give me your Signed-off-by so I can include it into
> my patch queue?

Sure. If it's tested, I have no problem with signing off on it, so
just add it. Do you have some kind of commit message that makes sense
and explains the NMI shadow issue?

                     Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/