linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2011.1] fs: symlink restrictions on sticky directories

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4EDFAECF.9010407@xenotime.net>
Date:	Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:22:07 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Federica Teodori <federica.teodori@...glemail.com>,
	Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>,
	kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2011.1] fs: symlink restrictions on sticky directories

On 12/06/2011 03:58 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>  Documentation/sysctl/fs.txt |   21 ++++++++++++
>  fs/Kconfig                  |   15 ++++++++
>  fs/namei.c                  |   77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  kernel/sysctl.c             |   10 +++++
>  4 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)


> diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig
> index 5f4c45d..74b9e49 100644
> --- a/fs/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/Kconfig
> @@ -278,3 +278,18 @@ source "fs/nls/Kconfig"
>  source "fs/dlm/Kconfig"
>  
>  endmenu
> +
> +config PROTECTED_STICKY_SYMLINKS
> +	bool "Protect symlink following in sticky world-writable directories"
> +	help
> +	  A long-standing class of security issues is the symlink-based
> +	  time-of-check-time-of-use race, most commonly seen in
> +	  world-writable directories like /tmp. The common method of
> +	  exploitation of this flaw is to cross privilege boundaries
> +	  when following a given symlink (i.e. a root process follows
> +	  a malicious symlink belonging to another user).
> +
> +	  Enabling this solves the problem by permitting symlinks to only

better:

	  Enabling this solves the problem by permitting symlinks to be followed
	  only when the uid ...

> +	  be followed when outside a sticky world-writable directory,
> +	  or when the uid of the symlink and follower match, or when
> +	  the directory and symlink owners match.
> diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> index 5008f01..c4d0bfc 100644
> --- a/fs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/namei.c
> @@ -624,10 +625,69 @@ static inline void put_link(struct nameidata *nd, struct path *link, void *cooki
> +
> +/**
> + * may_follow_link - Check symlink following for unsafe situations
> + * @dentry: The inode/dentry of the symlink
> + * @nameidata: The path data of the symlink
> + *
> + * In the case of the protected_sticky_symlinks sysctl being enabled,
> + * CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE needs to be specifically ignored if the symlink is
> + * in a sticky world-writable directory. This is to protect privileged
> + * processes from failing races against path names that may change out
> + * from under them by way of other users creating malicious symlinks.
> + * It will permit symlinks to only be followed when outside a sticky

similar:

      It will permit symlinks to be followed only when outside a sticky

> + * world-writable directory, or when the uid of the symlink and follower
> + * match, or when the directory owner matches the symlink's owner.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 if following the symlink is allowed, -ve on error.
> + */
> +static inline int
> +may_follow_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nameidata)


-- 
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/