[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABPqkBSKhcB+jAzfy7HJ_j1u5qz59eGoTzZzsgHhMwdYBkT2Fw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 20:22:52 -0800
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, acme@...hat.com,
ming.m.lin@...el.com, andi@...stfloor.org, robert.richter@....com,
ravitillo@....gov, will.deacon@....com, paulus@...ba.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, rth@...ddle.net, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
davem@...emloft.net, lethal@...ux-sh.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] perf_events: add LBR mappings for
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH filters (v2)
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 14:37 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> void intel_pmu_lbr_init_atom(void)
>> {
>> + /*
>> + * only models starting at stepping 10 seems
>> + * to have an operational LBR which can freeze
>> + * on PMU interrupt
>> + */
>> + if (boot_cpu_data.x86_mask < 10) {
>> + pr_cont("LBR disabled due to erratum");
>> + return;
>> + }
>
> Shouldn't that be a separate patch?
I'll make it into a separate patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists