[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111207231512.519385bb.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 23:15:12 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Andrew Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc 3/3] prctl: Add PR_SET_MM codes to tune up mm_struct
entires
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 11:07:24 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > The prctl(2) manpage will need to be updated. Please Cc Michael on all
> > such changes.
> >
>
> you mean -- Michael Kerrisk, mtk AT man7.org, right?
That isn't what ./MAINTAINERS says?
> >
> > This is starting to add a non-trivial amount of code. Perhaps we need
> > to introduce a Kconfig variable to control such things as this, to
> > prevent bloating up kernels which aren't require to support c/r?
> >
>
> Dunno, Andrew. Actually I agreed that these snippets are mostly
> needed for c/r only, but the initial idea over all changes was
> to add levers into kernel which might be helpful not only
> for c/r but for someone else as well.
In each instance, a case would need to be made for that. Plus if
people later come along who want access to these things for other
purposes, they can send a patch!
There will always be people who would *prefer* that this material not
be present in their vmlinux. For those people, this patch is a
regression!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists