[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1323332205.1641.29.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 13:46:45 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
Cc: 'Tushar Behera' <tushar.behera@...aro.org>,
'Boojin Kim' <boojin.kim@...sung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] DMA: PL330: Remove pm_runtime_xxx calls from pl330
probe/remove
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 16:43 +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Vinod Koul wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 16:15 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
> > > amba_probe() now calls pm_runtime_get_noresume() and pm_runtime_enable()
> > > for the devices before the device probe is called. Hence we don't need
> > > to call pm_runtime_get_xxx and pm_runtime_enable() in device probe again.
> > > In the same way, since amba_remove() calls the respective pm_runtime
> > > functions, those functions need not be called from device remove.
> > >
> > > This patch fixes following run time error with pl330 driver.
> > >
> > > dma-pl330 dma-pl330.0: Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable!
> > > dma-pl330 dma-pl330.0: failed to get runtime pm
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Giridhar Maruthy <giridhar.maruthy@...aro.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@...aro.org>
> > Looks fine to me. Do you want these to go thru slave-dma or samsung
> > tree.
>
> Hi Vinod,
>
> I think, this patch can be sent to upstream via slave-dma tree and
> second one via Samsung tree separately and you can add my and Boojin
> Kim's ack(actually, she replied) on this when you apply.
Okay, I have applied this one only
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists