[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1323340668.3904.21.camel@lappy>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 12:37:48 +0200
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
markmc@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-ring: Use threshold for switching to indirect
descriptors
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 20:14 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 17:48:17 +0200, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 04:02:45PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 20:23 +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > Rusty, Michael, does the below looks a reasonable optimization for you?
> >
> > OK overall but a bit hard to say for sure as it looks pretty incomplete ...
>
> A static threshold is very hackish; we need to either initialize it to
> a proven-good value (since noone will ever change it) or be cleverer.
I'll better wait to see how the threshold issue is resolved, and
possibly do it as a dynamic value which depends on the threshold.
I doubt theres one magic value which would work for all.
--
Sasha.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists