[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111208113422.GA27919@amit-x200.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 17:04:22 +0530
From: Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>
To: Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>
Cc: avi@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, arnd@...db.de,
ryanh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, aliguori@...ibm.com, mtosatti@...hat.com,
jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com, levinsasha928@...il.com,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 V5] Avoid soft lockup message when KVM is stopped by
host
On (Mon) 05 Dec 2011 [15:18:59], Eric B Munson wrote:
> When a guest kernel is stopped by the host hypervisor it can look like a soft
> lockup to the guest kernel. This false warning can mask later soft lockup
> warnings which may be real. This patch series adds a method for a host
> hypervisor to communicate to a guest kernel that it is being stopped. The
> final patch in the series has the watchdog check this flag when it goes to
> issue a soft lockup warning and skip the warning if the guest knows it was
> stopped.
Guest S4 would need similar treatment, and I think the code in the two
approaches can be shared. Just something to consider.
Amit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists