[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111208155844.GA9281@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 10:58:44 -0500
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Phillip Susi <psusi@....rr.com>
Cc: Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add partition resize function to BLKPG ioctl
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 10:25:26AM -0500, Phillip Susi wrote:
> On 12/8/2011 10:16 AM, Karel Zak wrote:
> > Is it safe to alter the partition size in arbitrary way if the
> > partition is used by any process?
> >
> > Vivek's BLKPG_EXTEND_PARTITIONV seems more safety, because it extends
> > a partition size only, so all offsets in all running stuff are still
> > valid.
> >
> > Maybe you need to check bdevp->bd_openers and returns -EBUSY if you
> > want to alter the begin of the partition.
>
> I disallowed altering the start of the partition ( that would just
> be crazy ), but altering the end has been supported on lvm for years
> now. Ext4 can not perform an online shrink, but btrfs can, and I was
> able to successfully have btrfs shrink the fs and then use
> BLKPG_RES_PARTITION to shrink the partition.
So, if there is an IO in flight while partition shrinking is happening,
then IO can end up happening outside the partition?
part->nr_sects can be 64 bits on 32bit machines and update will be
non-atomic. I had used sequence counter to make sure read is able
to get to intermediate value. May be it is a good idea to address
this concenrn.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists