[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111208192014.GA9794@albatros>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 23:20:14 +0400
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: remove superfluous debug output
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 16:48 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > - pr_debug("proc: options = %s\n", options);
> > -
> > if (!options)
> > return 1;
>
> So it turns out that this patch is a fix against the pending
> procfs-add-hidepid=-and-gid=-mount-options.patch. Please tell people
> this sort of thing to prevent confusion.
Oops, sorry. Will do this next time.
> Also, I have a note here that Alexey has issues with
> procfs-add-hidepid=-and-gid=-mount-options.patch (it is reproduced
> below) - he suggests that it is using incorrect types. Where do we
> stand with that?
This is not a bug, surely. IMHO, it's better to have it as the longest
possible format for the future changes. It's wearily to find such %d
for pid_t instances all over the kernel if we change pid_t from int to
long.
The same question, btw:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1270730.html
Probably it's better to add official point about this issue into
Documentation/ ?
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists