[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF1750B77B9F@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 14:24:46 -0800
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Documentation/pinctrl: various minor fixes
Uwe Kleine-König wrote at Thursday, December 08, 2011 3:22 PM:
> - add some consts
> - don't use the group index alone to determine the value to write to
> foo's mux register. For spi and i2c the group index is always 0.
> Additionally using the function index makes much more sense as it
> generates a different value for each function/group pair.
> - fix a few syntax errors
> @@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ static int foo_get_groups(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector,
> int foo_enable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector,
> unsigned group)
> {
> - u8 regbit = (1 << group);
> + u8 regbit = (1 << selector + group);
>
> writeb((readb(MUX)|regbit), MUX)
> return 0;
> @@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ int foo_enable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector,
> int foo_disable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector,
> unsigned group)
> {
> - u8 regbit = (1 << group);
> + u8 regbit = (1 << selector);
>
> writeb((readb(MUX) & ~(regbit)), MUX)
> return 0;
Shouldn't those two regbit calculations match?
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists