linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] oom: add tracepoints for oom_score

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 9 Dec 2011 08:41:03 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rientjes@...gle.com, dchinner@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom: add tracepoints for oom_score_adj

On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 12:33:35 -0500
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> On 12/7/2011 8:47 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 11:52:02 -0500
> > KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 12/6/2011 7:54 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> >>> >From 28189e4622fd97324893a0b234183f64472a54d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >>> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> >>> Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 09:58:16 +0900
> >>> Subject: [PATCH] oom: trace point for oom_score_adj
> >>>
> >>> oom_score_adj is set to prevent a task from being killed by OOM-Killer.
> >>> Some daemons sets this value and their children inerit it sometimes.
> >>> Because inheritance of oom_score_adj is done automatically, users
> >>> can be confused at seeing the value and finds it's hard to debug.
> >>>
> >>> This patch adds trace point for oom_score_adj. This adds 3 trace
> >>> points. at
> >>> 	- update oom_score_adj
> >>
> >>
> >>> 	- fork()
> >>> 	- rename task->comm(typically, exec())
> >>
> >> I don't think they have oom specific thing. Can you please add generic fork and
> >> task rename tracepoint instead?
> >>
> > I think it makes oom-targeted debug difficult.
> > This tracehook using task->signal->oom_score_adj as filter.
> > This reduces traces much and makes debugging easier.
> >  
> > If you need another trace point for other purpose, another trace point
> > should be better. For generic purpose, oom_socre_adj filtering will not
> > be necessary.
> 
> see Documentation/trace/event.txt 5. Event filgtering
> 
> Now, both ftrace and perf have good filter feature. Isn't this enough?
> 

Could you make patch ? Then, I stop this and go other probelm.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/