| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20111208153230.9c68eab3.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 15:32:30 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rientjes@...gle.com, dchinner@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH v4] oom: add tracepoints for oom_score_adj
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 10:47:05 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 11:52:02 -0500
> KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
- [pid] comm
> > - pid:comm
> > - comm:pid
> > - comm-pid (ftrace specific)
> >
> > Why do we need to introduce alternative printing style?
> >
>
v4 here
==
>From 5dc1f8c879ae424d5853af255df8860494209e39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 09:58:16 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] oom: trace point for oom_score_adj
oom_score_adj is set to prevent a task from being killed by OOM-Killer.
Some daemons sets this value and their children inerit it sometimes.
Because inheritance of oom_score_adj is done automatically, users
can be confused at seeing the value and finds it's hard to debug.
This patch adds trace point for oom_score_adj. This adds 3 trace
points. at
- update oom_score_adj
- fork()
- rename task->comm(typically, exec())
At fork and rename, this trace has filters as task->signal->oom_score_adj != 0.
Then, users can extract information required for fixing oom problem easily.
<...>-2456 [002] 87.347612: oom_score_adj_update: task 2456:bash updates oom_score_adj=-1000
<...>-2456 [002] 90.228660: oom_score_adj_inherited: new_task=2480 oom_score_adj=-1000
ls-2480 [007] 90.229122: oom_score_task_rename: rename task 2480:bash to ls oom_score_adj=-1000
<...>-2456 [006] 111.024606: oom_score_adj_inherited: new_task=2482 oom_score_adj=-1000
bash-2482 [003] 111.025174: oom_score_task_rename: rename task 2482:bash to bash oom_score_adj=-1000
Changelog v3->v4:
- change format from pid[comm] to pid:comm
- updated patch description.
Changelog v2->v3:
- use TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION to check condition.
- use %d for pid.
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
---
fs/exec.c | 4 ++
fs/proc/base.c | 3 ++
include/trace/events/oom.h | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/fork.c | 5 +++
mm/oom_kill.c | 6 +++
5 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/trace/events/oom.h
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index ca141db..9e99cf9 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -59,6 +59,8 @@
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/mmu_context.h>
#include <asm/tlb.h>
+
+#include <trace/events/oom.h>
#include "internal.h"
int core_uses_pid;
@@ -1054,6 +1056,8 @@ void set_task_comm(struct task_struct *tsk, char *buf)
{
task_lock(tsk);
+ trace_oom_score_task_rename(tsk, buf);
+
/*
* Threads may access current->comm without holding
* the task lock, so write the string carefully.
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 1050b1c..f201e64 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_HARDWALL
#include <asm/hardwall.h>
#endif
+#include <trace/events/oom.h>
#include "internal.h"
/* NOTE:
@@ -1166,6 +1167,7 @@ static ssize_t oom_adjust_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
else
task->signal->oom_score_adj = (oom_adjust * OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MAX) /
-OOM_DISABLE;
+ trace_oom_score_adj_update(task);
err_sighand:
unlock_task_sighand(task, &flags);
err_task_lock:
@@ -1253,6 +1255,7 @@ static ssize_t oom_score_adj_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
task->signal->oom_score_adj = oom_score_adj;
if (has_capability_noaudit(current, CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
task->signal->oom_score_adj_min = oom_score_adj;
+ trace_oom_score_adj_update(task);
/*
* Scale /proc/pid/oom_adj appropriately ensuring that OOM_DISABLE is
* always attainable.
diff --git a/include/trace/events/oom.h b/include/trace/events/oom.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..275155c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/trace/events/oom.h
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
+#define TRACE_SYSTEM oom
+
+#if !defined(_TRACE_OOM_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
+#define _TRACE_OOM_H
+#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
+
+TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION(oom_score_adj_inherited,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *task),
+
+ TP_ARGS(task),
+
+ TP_CONDITION(task->signal->oom_score_adj != 0),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field( pid_t, newpid)
+ __field( int, oom_score_adj)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->newpid = task->pid;
+ __entry->oom_score_adj = task->signal->oom_score_adj;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("new_task=%d oom_score_adj=%d",
+ __entry->newpid, __entry->oom_score_adj)
+);
+
+TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION(oom_score_task_rename,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *task, char *comm),
+
+ TP_ARGS(task, comm),
+
+ TP_CONDITION(task->signal->oom_score_adj != 0),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field( pid_t, pid)
+ __array( char, oldcomm, TASK_COMM_LEN )
+ __array( char, newcomm, TASK_COMM_LEN )
+ __field( int, oom_score_adj)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->pid = task->pid;
+ memcpy(__entry->oldcomm, task->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
+ memcpy(__entry->newcomm, comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
+ __entry->oom_score_adj = task->signal->oom_score_adj;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("rename task %d:%s to %s oom_score_adj=%d",
+ __entry->pid, __entry->oldcomm, __entry->newcomm,
+ __entry->oom_score_adj)
+);
+
+TRACE_EVENT(oom_score_adj_update,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *task),
+
+ TP_ARGS(task),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field( pid_t, pid)
+ __array( char, comm, TASK_COMM_LEN )
+ __field( int, oom_score_adj)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->pid = task->pid;
+ memcpy(__entry->comm, task->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
+ __entry->oom_score_adj = task->signal->oom_score_adj;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("task %d:%s updates oom_score_adj=%d",
+ __entry->pid, __entry->comm, __entry->oom_score_adj)
+);
+
+#endif
+
+/* This part must be outside protection */
+#include <trace/define_trace.h>
+
+
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index e20518d..758e5db 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@
#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
#include <trace/events/sched.h>
+#include <trace/events/oom.h>
/*
* Protected counters by write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock)
@@ -1390,6 +1391,10 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
if (clone_flags & CLONE_THREAD)
threadgroup_fork_read_unlock(current);
perf_event_fork(p);
+
+ if (!(clone_flags & CLONE_THREAD))
+ trace_oom_score_adj_inherited(p);
+
return p;
bad_fork_free_pid:
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index e2e1402..46b6d0a 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -33,6 +33,10 @@
#include <linux/security.h>
#include <linux/ptrace.h>
#include <linux/freezer.h>
+#include <linux/ftrace.h>
+
+#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
+#include <trace/events/oom.h>
int sysctl_panic_on_oom;
int sysctl_oom_kill_allocating_task;
@@ -55,6 +59,7 @@ void compare_swap_oom_score_adj(int old_val, int new_val)
spin_lock_irq(&sighand->siglock);
if (current->signal->oom_score_adj == old_val)
current->signal->oom_score_adj = new_val;
+ trace_oom_score_adj_update(current);
spin_unlock_irq(&sighand->siglock);
}
@@ -74,6 +79,7 @@ int test_set_oom_score_adj(int new_val)
spin_lock_irq(&sighand->siglock);
old_val = current->signal->oom_score_adj;
current->signal->oom_score_adj = new_val;
+ trace_oom_score_adj_update(current);
spin_unlock_irq(&sighand->siglock);
return old_val;
--
1.7.4.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists