linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5 resend] VFS: Fix s

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 9 Dec 2011 06:47:45 -0500
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Surbhi Palande <csurbhi@...il.com>,
	Valerie Aurora <val@...consulting.com>,
	Christopher Chaltain <christopher.chaltain@...onical.com>,
	"Peter M. Petrakis" <peter.petrakis@...onical.com>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
	Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5 resend] VFS: Fix s_umount thaw/write deadlock

On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 12:16:58AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > We make sure to not dirty any new inodes after the first phase of the
> > freeze, so this should be a BUG_ON/WARN_ON.
>   This is not really true in presence of mmaped writes. To block mmaped
> writes on a frozen filesystem, we need some synchronization between
> page_mkwrite() and freezing code. Currently, to avoid any additional
> locking overhead, we set page dirty and *then* check for filesystem being
> frozen. Only this order can make sure either the page is written (and
> write-protected) or the frozen check triggers and we wait... (see the
> comment in block_page_mkwrite()). The nasty sideeffect of this is that
> there can be dirty pages & inodes on a frozen filesystem. We are blocked in
> the page fault of these pages so user cannot write any data to these pages
> but still they are marked dirty.
> 
> Alternatively we could have a different mechanism (rw semaphore?) to
> synchronize page faults and freezing but I'd hate the overhead for the case
> almost noone cares about...

I think the is the only sensible way to go forward.  Requiring hacks in
lots of random places to work around the fact that a single place that
might actually dirty pages despite supposedly blocking that from happen
simply isn't maintainable over the long run.

> > > +	 */
> > > +	if (vfs_is_frozen(sb)) {
> > > +		ret = -EBUSY;
> > > +		goto out_drop_super;
> > > +	}
> > 
> > How about spending the three minutes to figure it out?
> > Q_GETFMT/Q_GETINFO/Q_XGETQSTAT and Q_GETQUOTA are the obvious read-only
> > candidates.
>   Q_GETQUOTA can actually cause filesystem modification (reservation of
> space in quota file) but the others are read-only. Also after some thought
> I'd prefer that quotactl(8) just blocks to be consistent with how other
> syscalls behave...

How can a simple dqget cause modifications in the VFS quota code?
Dirting anything for a simple read of the quota information is not
only completely non-obvious but also doesn't make much sene.  We don't
dirty metadata on stat() either..

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/