[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111209100420.feaef96a.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 10:04:20 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
<ebiederm@...ssion.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<gthelen@...gle.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <kirill@...temov.name>,
<avagin@...allels.com>, <devel@...nvz.org>,
<eric.dumazet@...il.com>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
<hannes@...xchg.org>, <mhocko@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/9] per-cgroup tcp memory pressure controls
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 09:06:17 -0200
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com> wrote:
> On 12/05/2011 07:34 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is my new attempt to fix all the concerns that were raised during
> > the last iteration.
> >
> > I should highlight:
> > 1) proc information is kept intact. (although I kept the wrapper functions)
> > it will be submitted as a follow up patch so it can get the attention it
> > deserves
> > 2) sockets now hold a reference to memcg. sockets can be alive even after the
> > task is gone, so we don't bother with between cgroups movements.
> > To be able to release resources more easily in this cenario, the parent
> > pointer in struct cg_proto was replaced by a memcg object. We then iterate
> > through its pointer (which is cleaner anyway)
> >
> > The rest should be mostly the same except for small fixes and style changes.
> >
>
> Kame,
>
> Does this one address your previous concerns?
>
Your highlight seems good. I'll look into details.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists