linux-kernel - Re: workqueue_set_max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 9 Dec 2011 08:57:02 -0800
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: workqueue_set_max_active(wq, 0)?

Hello, Johannes. :)

On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 10:54:42AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> And then I found workqueue_set_max_active() but passing 0 isn't allowed.
> 
> Before I dive in more deeply I figured I'd ask if you think what a good
> way of doing this would be (and whether I'm completely insane) :-)

Hmmm... yeah, actually, that's what wq uses internally to implement
freezable workqueues.  It sets max_active to 0 temporarily and waits
for all in-flight works to finish.  On thaw, the original value is
restored.

Updating workqueue_set_max_active() to return the old value would be a
nice API update which goes together, I think.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/