[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111209182448.GA29629@gere.osrc.amd.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 19:24:48 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86-ML <x86@...nel.org>,
EDAC devel <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, MCE: Drain mcelog buffer
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 10:19:02AM -0800, Luck, Tony wrote:
> void mce_register_decode_chain(struct notifier_block *nb)
> {
> atomic_notifier_chain_register(&x86_mce_decoder_chain, nb);
> + drain_mcelog_buffer();
> }
>
> Won't this dump all the pended stuff to the *first* guy to
> register - but subsequent interested parties will still
> miss out?
Yeah,
this is currently assuming that we have one consumer per system. At
least this is the case on AMD: MCE decoder registers and decodes the
errors. It will pass a subset of the MCEs (DRAM ECCs) to amd64_edac for
additional massaging.
Do you see a usecase for multiple consumers?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists