linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] power_supply: add power supply scope

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4EE23E21.7090509@goop.org>
Date:	Fri, 09 Dec 2011 08:58:09 -0800
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
CC:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Richard Hughes <hughsient@...il.com>,
	Daniel Nicoletti <dantti12@...il.com>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	vojtech@....cz, Przemo Firszt <przemo@...szt.eu>,
	Richard Hughes <richard@...hsie.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] power_supply: add power supply scope

On 12/09/2011 01:59 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 12:18:47AM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> On 12/08/2011 03:36 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>>> No different at all, I'm fine with either power_supply.scope or any
>>> other flag. :-)
>> So are you happy to pull that branch, or did you have some other
>> concerns with it?
> I'm OK w/ the idea itself, but to actually pull that branch, the issue
> w/ needless patching of battery drivers has to be fixed (i.e. drop the
> changes in the drivers/acpi/).

OK, and just use the default System?  So only patch devices which are
actually self-powered?

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/