[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdahqb0qMVcKF9NBT5pwRgK4FOob5ABtb7ids9Bhh5XbZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:55:58 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
ext Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] pinctrl: add a driver for NVIDIA Tegra
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com> wrote:
> Hence, there's no point parsing it from device tree; we end up with exactly
> the same data in the driver, yet have spent a bunch of time parsing it out
> from device tree instead of just embedding it into the kernel binary.
For me there are two points:
- Avoiding clash with kernel maintainers who hate firmware-like tables and
binary data filling up the kernel. Some certain other guy bearing my
name comes to mind.
- Footprint: the majority of the stuff in your driver ends up in non-discardable
memory, and will be kept around. Since we have this concept of a
single zImage for a number of say ARMv7 systems, and since pin
controllers can be pretty hard to load from modules, *all* of them
may have to be compiled-in. If every driver for every board takes this
approach I am afraid it will be end up with a measurable footprint.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists