[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbOo6MhQhWJmT4Q49BjsAU94obKdvvsSQ=KreiL1y_owg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 01:04:59 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] pinctrl: add a driver for Energy Micro's efm32 SoCs
2011/12/9 Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>:
> Uwe Kleine-König wrote at Thursday, December 08, 2011 3:41 PM:
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
>
>> +config PINMUX_EFM32
>> + bool "EFM32 pinmux driver"
>> + depends on ARCH_EFM32
>> + default y
>> + select PINMUX
>
> LinusW,
>
> Since this is the pinctrl not pinmux subsystem now, does it make sense
> to name the driver Kconfig options PINCTRL_FOO and the files pinctrl-
> foo.c? I see that the coh901 driver already does that, and I followed
> that convention in my Tegra pinctrl patches.
Hm, the U300 pinmux is named pinmux-u300.c because it can only do
pinmux. It cannot do anything else. But if it's confusing we can surely
name everything pinctrl-*.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists