[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EE33766.6060704@monstr.eu>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:41:42 +0100
From: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
CC: grant.likely@...retlab.ca, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
anton.vorontsov@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] microblaze: Introduce IRQ_SW_OFFSET to help with
sw IRQ
Rob Herring wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 05:45 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
>> If you setup IRQ_OFFSET > nr_irq you completely separate hardware
>> and software IRQs which help you with debugging.
>>
>> For example:
>> IRQ_SW_OFFSET = 32
>>
>> DTS HW(line) LINUX
>> timer - 2 3 35
>> sysace 4 5 37
>> serial 5 6 38
>>
>> HW line is setup DTS + NO_IRQ_OFFSET to ensure that NO_IRQ is always 0.
>>
>
> This is really confusing. DTS is the HW numbering. The last 2 columns
> are both Linux IRQ numbering. Just create a single define for an offset.
> Then I would combine this into the previous patch.
>
DTS generator, which we used for DTS generator for more than 2 years,
generates for the first IRQ in the system this property "interrupts = < 0 2 >;"
Which is HW line 1 and linux irq_data->hwirq 0 (because of shift) and irq_data->irq = 1
for SW_OFFSET=0.
Anyway no problem to keep just NO_IRQ_OFFSET value.
Thanks,
Michal
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel 2.6 Microblaze Linux - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists