lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK=WgbbZU=NJupPCeXfy5WcFCvzoCgmcf5HPWUEFaHMwLLCWJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 11 Dec 2011 09:30:48 +0200
From:	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
To:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Daniel Drake <dsd@...top.org>,
	Joe Woodward <jw@...rafix.co.uk>, Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
	Bing Zhao <bzhao@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc/sdio: don't allow interface to runtime-suspend until
 probe is finished.

On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 9:15 AM, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de> wrote:
> When I force it to hold off suspend for a little while I see (starting at the
> same place):
>
> [  656.189697] bus: 'sdio': driver_probe_device: matched device mmc1:0001:1 with driver libertas_sdio
> [  656.212768] bus: 'sdio': really_probe: probing driver libertas_sdio with device mmc1:0001:1
> [  656.247741] libertas_sdio mmc1:0001:1: firmware: requesting libertas/sd8686_v9_helper.bin
> [  656.257537] device: 'mmc1:0001:1': device_add
> [  656.263580] PM: Adding info for No Bus:mmc1:0001:1
> [  656.298187] device: 'mmc1:0001:1': device_unregister
> [  656.303375] PM: Removing info for No Bus:mmc1:0001:1
> [  656.322967] libertas_sdio mmc1:0001:1: firmware: requesting libertas/sd8686_v8_helper.bin
> [  656.344207] device: 'mmc1:0001:1': device_add
> [  656.357147] PM: Adding info for No Bus:mmc1:0001:1
> [  656.395782] device: 'mmc1:0001:1': device_unregister
> [  656.407409] PM: Removing info for No Bus:mmc1:0001:1
> [  656.418579] libertas_sdio mmc1:0001:1: firmware: requesting sd8686_helper.bin
> [  656.435699] device: 'mmc1:0001:1': device_add
> [  656.446655] PM: Adding info for No Bus:mmc1:0001:1
> [  656.504974] device: 'mmc1:0001:1': device_unregister
> [  656.511749] PM: Removing info for No Bus:mmc1:0001:1
> [  656.521148] libertas_sdio mmc1:0001:1: firmware: requesting sd8686.bin
> [  656.529205] device: 'mmc1:0001:1': device_add
> [  656.535095] PM: Adding info for No Bus:mmc1:0001:1
> [  656.584625] device: 'mmc1:0001:1': device_unregister
> [  656.591369] PM: Removing info for No Bus:mmc1:0001:1
> [  657.384063] libertas_sdio mmc1:0001:1: (unregistered net_device): 00:19:88:3d:ff:f0, fw 9.70.3p24, cap 0x00000303
> [  657.454467] libertas_sdio mmc1:0001:1: (unregistered net_device): PREP_CMD: command 0x00a3 failed: 2
> [  657.464080] device: 'phy0': device_add
>
>
>  But shortly there after the extra tracing I put in shows that mmc_power_off
>  is called,

Probably right after libertas' if_sdio_probe() returns ?

> then mmc_sdio_power_restore calls mmc_send_io_op_cond

Is that as a result of libertas' if_sdio_power_restore() being called
(i.e. someone/something called 'ifconfig up') ?

> which again
>  returns -110, but now it isn't a problem and the wifi chip keeps working.

if_sdio_power_restore doesn't check the return value of
pm_runtime_get_sync, so it won't error out, but I wonder how come the
chip still works.

>  So maybe the fact that we error-out in the first case is a problem??

It might be nice if Marvell could comment on this, though we can
probably empirically deduce this too.

>  I found that if I pull the reset line down and then let it back up then it
>  all works.

Nice. Joe, did this work out for you too ?

> So I have run out of ideas.  I can make it work by reseting the chip during
> mmc_power_up but I have no idea what is causing the chip to need a reset.

I wonder why the sdio reset command isn't helpful for you - it did
seem to resolve some issues for Daniel. Maybe you have two different
hardware revisions of the 8686 which behave differently in this
respect ?

> However for now I think I'll go with my 'remux' hack.

Feel free to post it so we can take a look.

Thanks,
Ohad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ