linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] nitpick: make simple functions inline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4EE4FCBB.9050600@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 11 Dec 2011 13:55:55 -0500
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
To:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jbottomley@...allels.com,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, bsingharora@...il.com, devel@...nvz.org,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, tj@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] nitpick: make simple functions inline

> -static int notify_on_release(const struct cgroup *cgrp)
> +static inline int notify_on_release(const struct cgroup *cgrp)
>   {
>   	return test_bit(CGRP_NOTIFY_ON_RELEASE,&cgrp->flags);
>   }
> 
> -static int clone_children(const struct cgroup *cgrp)
> +static inline int clone_children(const struct cgroup *cgrp)
>   {
>   	return test_bit(CGRP_CLONE_CHILDREN,&cgrp->flags);
>   }

Can you please tell us which compiler failed automatic inlining?
I suspect gcc is enough sane and we don't need this patch.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/