[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EE4FD8D.4020704@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 13:59:25 -0500
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jbottomley@...allels.com,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, bsingharora@...il.com, devel@...nvz.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, tj@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] make 'none' field a flag
(12/11/11 9:45 AM), Glauber Costa wrote:
> There is no reason to have a flags field, and then a separate
> bool field just to indicate if 'none' subsystem were explicitly
> requested.
>
> Make it a flag
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa<glommer@...allels.com>
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists