[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:02:36 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] kvm tool: Serial emulation overhaul
> > You can emulate a chip with a 64byte or so FIFO. You can do I/O cycle
> > prediction in the kernel part and you can use the empty bit as a clue
> > (which is what most serial<->ethernet widgetry does).
>
> The performance problems here aren't the same performance problems you
> have on real hardware. The problem here is that it costs 40k cycles for
> the guest to access the emulated chip.
How much of that 40K cycles is bouncing back and forth into emulation
layers and how much of it is the kernel trap ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists