linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: Correct revision display for WM1811 revision D

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:15:47 +0100
From:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: Correct revision display for WM1811 revision D

Hi Mark,

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 04:52:34PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> As WM1811 revision C was transparent to software the revision IDs for
> subsequent revisions are one less than they would normally be. Correct
> for this in log messages.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> ---
> 
> I can fold this and other updates into the big regmap changes I posted
> the other day if that's helpful?
It seems you have quite many wm8994 patches on your mfd/wm8994 branch. It
would probably make sense for you to carry them through the regmap changes. If
that's fine with you, feel free to add my Acked-by to them.

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/