[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:26:01 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 21:47:44 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> I suppose this is a good enough fix for that:
>
> include/linux/mempolicy.h | 10 ----------
> mm/mempolicy.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
OK, I applied this to the akpm tree today.
> > I have reverted that patch for today (and the following trivial patch
> > "cpusets-stall-when-updating-mems_allowed-for-mempolicy-or-disjoint-nodemask-fix-2-fix").
>
> And I'll drop that one now.
And dropped that one.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists