linux-kernel - Re: [patch 00/24 ] dynamic debug enhancements: multi-queries during mod-init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJfuBxxnT8va7DRt8e7s=LrSqHYThb_8fkbSO69Fii3r1x0hvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:00:19 -0700
From:	Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/24 ] dynamic debug enhancements: multi-queries during mod-init

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:17:43PM -0700, Jim Cromie wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 12:11:10PM -0700, jim.cromie@...il.com wrote:
>> >> 0001-kernel-module.c-fix-compile-err-warnings-under-ifdef.patch
>> >> 0002-dynamic_debug-fix-whitespace-complaints-from-scripts.patch
>> >> 0024-dynamic_debug-remove-unneeded-includes.patch
>> >>
>> >
>> > Now that is just about the most unhelpful 00/XX email I've seen in a
>> > long time.
>> >
>>
>> Sorry about that.
>> That was an attempt to thread onto a previous message.
>>
>> In-Reply-To: <CAJfuBxyyriN6vYgwzEft9PKFjWsa2E4FZmbFMmtO6G_DP=nosg@...l.gmail.com>,
>> <CAJfuBxzM6rg21Rpq+ww+=2qK_am44V-Btvhp3Z3hbP2TKP8JTw@...l.gmail.com>
>> References: <CAJfuBxyyriN6vYgwzEft9PKFjWsa2E4FZmbFMmtO6G_DP=nosg@...l.gmail.com>,
>> <CAJfuBxzM6rg21Rpq+ww+=2qK_am44V-Btvhp3Z3hbP2TKP8JTw@...l.gmail.com>
>>
>> IE this:
>>
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1171277/match=dynamic_debug
>>
>> I'll use URLs in the future.
>
> Use git-send-email and you will not have to do any of this by hand, it
> handles it all for you automatically.
>
> greg k-h


I did use git-send-email.
What I seem to miss on every send is which reference to use in the
reply-to part,
at least when trying to tie it to an email sent from the web-interface.
It doesnt help that gmail isnt displaying them in a thread for me
using the headers that git-send-email is adding (it threads by subject)

(for most recent batch..)
Message-Id: <1323731569-20644-22-git-send-email-jim.cromie@...il.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.7.3
In-Reply-To: <1323731569-20644-1-git-send-email-jim.cromie@...il.com>
References: <1323731569-20644-1-git-send-email-jim.cromie@...il.com>

On previous batch (the one you commented on), IIRC, I deleted all
--compose content
after realizing the patch-count was wrong, thinking it would behave like
a rebase -i with an empty to-do file.  Or, it was some other operator error.

Looking now at the headers, I'll trust that --compose will work the same,
and use that only (should the latest set need another resend)

thanks
Jim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/