linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/8] ACPI: add processor driver for Xen virtual CPUs.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4EE71A62.9050700@oracle.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:26:58 +0800
From:	liang tang <liang.tang@...cle.com>
To:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
CC:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	stefan.bader@...onical.com, Ian.Campbell@...rix.com,
	mike.mcclurg@...rix.com, jeremy@...p.org, ke.yu@...el.com,
	kevin.tian@...el.com, konrad@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org,
	xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, rjw@...k.pl,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/8] ACPI: add processor driver for Xen virtual
 CPUs.

On 2011-12-13 15:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 12.12.11 at 18:29, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad.wilk@...cle.com>  wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 09:24:23AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 30.11.11 at 18:21, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad.wilk@...cle.com>  wrote:
>>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
>>>> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_METHOD)+= custom_method.o
>>>>   # processor has its own "processor." module_param namespace
>>>>   processor-y			:= processor_driver.o processor_throttling.o
>>>>   processor-y			+= processor_idle.o processor_thermal.o
>>>> +processor-y			+= processor_xen.o
>>> This should minimally be processor-$(CONFIG_XEN), with other things
>>> adjusted as necessary.
>> I was under the impression that this was required to get the
>> processor_xen.ko
>> to be a module. Otherwise it would only compile as built-in.
> processor_xen.ko? Why not have all the code go into processor.ko?
> (And the original construct didn't aim in that direction either.)
>
> Jan
>
the code about driver function which kernel 
require(drivers/acpi/processor_xen.c )  build into processor.ko.
the code which have more relation with xen 
(drivers/xen/acpi_processor.c)  did not build into processor.ko.
liang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/