[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1112131137130.3020@ionos>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:38:58 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: john.stultz@...aro.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
cschan@...eaurora.org, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:core/debugobjects] debugobjects: Be smarter about static
objects
Stephen,
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011, tip-bot for Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Commit-ID: feac18dda25134005909e7770c77464e65608bd8
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/feac18dda25134005909e7770c77464e65608bd8
> Author: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
> AuthorDate: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 19:48:26 -0800
> Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> CommitDate: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:49:22 +0100
>
> debugobjects: Be smarter about static objects
>
> Make debugobjects use the return code from the fixup function. That
> allows us better diagnostics in the activate check than relying on a
> WARN_ON() in the object specific code.
that series wreckaged the debugobjects selftest. Can you please have a
look?
[ 0.000000] ODEBUG: selftest warnings failed 4 != 5
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists