[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111213115436.GE12029@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:54:36 +0200
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Cc: Liu Ping Fan <kernelfans@...il.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avi@...hat.com, aliguori@...ibm.com,
jan.kiszka@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kvm: make vcpu life cycle separated from kvm instance
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 09:36:28AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:41:23AM +0800, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
> > From: Liu Ping Fan <pingfank@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > Currently, vcpu can be destructed only when kvm instance destroyed.
> > Change this to vcpu's destruction taken when its refcnt is zero,
> > and then vcpu MUST and CAN be destroyed before kvm's destroy.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan <pingfank@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c | 10 ++++--
> > arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c | 12 +++++--
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 7 ++--
> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
> > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > virt/kvm/irq_comm.c | 7 +++-
> > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 7 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>
> This needs a full audit of paths that access vcpus. See for one example
> bsp_vcpu pointer.
>
Yes. For now we should probably disallow removal of bsp, but we need to
get rid of bsp_vcpu at all. It is used only in two places. IOAPIC can be
changed to use kvm->bsp_vcpu_id and pic's use looks incorrect anyway.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists