[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1323780069.9082.15.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:41:09 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched: fix cgroup movement of newly created process
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 15:57 +0900, Daisuke Nishimura wrote:
> kernel/sched_fair.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
you blink you loose, that file doesn't exist anymore.
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> index 5c9e679..df145a9 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -4922,10 +4922,10 @@ static void task_move_group_fair(struct task_struct *p, int on_rq)
> * to another cgroup's rq. This does somewhat interfere with the
> * fair sleeper stuff for the first placement, but who cares.
> */
> - if (!on_rq)
> + if (!on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING)
> p->se.vruntime -= cfs_rq_of(&p->se)->min_vruntime;
> set_task_rq(p, task_cpu(p));
> - if (!on_rq)
> + if (!on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING)
> p->se.vruntime += cfs_rq_of(&p->se)->min_vruntime;
> }
> #endif
The much saner way of writing that is something like:
/*
* Comment explaining stuff..
*/
if (!on_rq && p->state == TASK_RUNNING)
on_rq = 1;
...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists