[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6E3BC7F7C9A4BF4286DD4C043110F30B672997EA57@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 21:01:53 +0800
From: "Shi, Alex" <alex.shi@...el.com>
To: "Shi, Alex" <alex.shi@...el.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
"penberg@...nel.org" <penberg@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] slub: set a criteria for slub node partial adding
> > > - if (tail == DEACTIVATE_TO_TAIL)
> > > + if (tail == DEACTIVATE_TO_TAIL ||
> > > + page->inuse > page->objects /2)
> > > list_add_tail(&page->lru, &n->partial);
> > > else
> > > list_add(&page->lru, &n->partial);
> > >
> > with the statistics patch above? I typically run with CONFIG_SLUB_STATS
> > disabled since it impacts performance so heavily and I'm not sure what
> > information you're looking for with regards to those stats.
>
> NO, when you collect data, please close SLUB_STAT in kernel config. _to_head
> statistics collection patch just tell you, I collected the statistics not include
> add_partial in early_kmem_cache_node_alloc(). And other places of
> add_partial were covered. Of course, the kernel with statistic can not be used
> to measure performance.
David, Did you have time to give a try?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists