[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111213093446.02de1df1@tlielax.poochiereds.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:34:46 -0500
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
roel <roel.kluin@...il.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
sage@...dream.net, Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
josef@...hat.com
Subject: Re: ceph, cifs, nfs, fuse: boolean and / or confusion
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:39:13 -0500
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 15:28 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:06:36 +0100
> > roel <roel.kluin@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The test not SEEK_CUR or not SEEK_SET always evaluates to true
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > fs/ceph/file.c | 2 +-
> > > fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 2 +-
> > > fs/fuse/file.c | 2 +-
> > > fs/nfs/file.c | 2 +-
> > > 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> <snip>
> > > diff --git a/fs/nfs/file.c b/fs/nfs/file.c
> > > index eca56d4..606ef0f 100644
> > > --- a/fs/nfs/file.c
> > > +++ b/fs/nfs/file.c
> > > @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static loff_t nfs_file_llseek(struct file *filp, loff_t offset, int origin)
> > > * origin == SEEK_END || SEEK_DATA || SEEK_HOLE => we must revalidate
> > > * the cached file length
> > > */
> > > - if (origin != SEEK_SET || origin != SEEK_CUR) {
> > > + if (origin != SEEK_SET && origin != SEEK_CUR) {
> > > struct inode *inode = filp->f_mapping->host;
> > >
> > > int retval = nfs_revalidate_file_size(inode, filp);
> >
> > This fix will cause changed runtime behaviour, such as NFS no longer
> > running nfs_revalidate_file_size() for all seek modes.
>
> As far as NFS is concerned, it reverts a regression. NFS only used to
> run revalidate_file_size() for SEEK_END prior to commit
> 06222e491e663dac939f04b125c9dc52126a75c4. I accept that we now also need
> to run it for SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA, but we've never had to do so for
> SEEK_SET and SEEK_CUR.
>
> I suspect the same is true of ceph, cifs etc...
>
(cc'ing Josef Bacik on this too, since he made this change originally)
Agreed. The patch looks correct to me for NFS and CIFS at at least.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists