[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EE76810.7000802@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:58:24 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] kvm tool: Serial emulation overhaul
On 12/13/2011 04:51 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > The whole APIC timer calibration and the back and forth
> > > conversion is definitely nothing which falls into the category of
> > > smart.
> >
> > APIC timer calibration is silly but it hasn't proven to be a real-world
> > problem.
>
> Well, that depends on the world.
What I mean by that, is that I haven't seen any bug reports in this area
apart from some issue with wiring the PIT/PIC/APIC correctly which were
resolved long ago.
> The issue with that calibration is
> that it can be off and for a certain category of application it
> matters. Definitely not for the usual virt workload stuff. But saving
> cycles for highres/nohz enabled guests would be nice. Maybe I have a
> go when I find a some time.
Just dropping the calibration an replacing it with a pre-calibrated
value should be simple, if there is a workload that could benefit.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists