[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111213165024.GA9391@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:50:27 -0500
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
"Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Taraka R. Bodireddy" <tarak.reddy@...ibm.com>,
"Seshagiri N. Ippili" <seshagiri.ippili@...ibm.com>,
"Manvanthara B. Puttashankar" <mputtash@...ibm.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>, gmuelas@...ibm.com,
dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Queue free fix (was Re: [PATCH] block: Free queue
resources at blk_release_queue())
On Mon, Dec 12 2011 at 7:39am -0500,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 03:18:03PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29 2011 at 7:00am -0500,
> > Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com> wrote:
> > > [ 4906.683654] Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference at virtual kernel address 6b6b6b6b6b6b6000
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > Gonzalo also tried 2.6.38.8 as suggested and ran into this one:
> > >
> > > [ 292.877936] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > [ 292.877939] Kernel BUG at 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6d [verbose debug info unavailable]
> >
> > Again, more poison.
> >
> > Seems this test is causing us to fall on our face no matter what.
> > Likely, best to leave this 2.6.38 blk_unplug crash to one side and
> > continue focusing on latest upstream.
>
> Sorry again, for taking so long to come back. This time however with good news:
>
> With 3.2.0-rc4.00255.g77a7300 we were unable to reproduce any I/O stall or
> user-after-free bugs even after nearly 3000 test iterations.
Great news, so with an eye towards getting these fixes upstream:
> The only patches on top we have are:
>
> two patches from Hannes:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg55112.html
Has that scsi_lib.c patch been posted with a formal patch header?
James, I'm not clear on where I should be looking to see what you have
staged but not yet sent to Linus. Does such a branch exist in your
scsi-misc-2.6 tree?
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg55413.html
Jun'ichi and Hannes said that additional NULL pointer check is needed:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2011-December/msg00022.html
Hannes said he'd re-post an updated patch (but hasn't yet).
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists