[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111213190632.GA5830@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:06:32 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
lee.schermerhorn@...com, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v3]numa: add a sysctl to control interleave allocation
granularity from each node to improve I/O performance
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:58:45AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> If mem plicy is interleaves, we will allocated pages from nodes in a round
> robin way. This surely can do interleave fairly, but not optimal.
>
> Say the pages will be used for I/O later. Interleave allocation for two pages
> are allocated from two nodes, so the pages are not physically continuous. Later
I would prefer to add a new policy (INTERLEAVE_MULTI or so) for this
instead of a global sysctl, that takes the additional parameter.
Also I don't like having more per task state. Could you compute this
from the address instead even for the process policy case?
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists