[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxNWiRQ1CkifhgcnnBqBa-xRNdM9Ze6bnxhsYd4ZYPg6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:52:35 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: printk() vs tty_io
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> I've been poking at reducing the constraints on printk(), like make it
> work under rq->lock etc..
You aren't supposed register a console that wakes things up. But the
only console that honors that afaik is the traditional vt console.
*Maybe* the network console, I didn't check.
I *assume* you only get this lockdep warning if you have a serial console?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists