linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] VFS: Rename and refactor writeback_inodes_sb_if

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4EE6C7AD.3020907@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:34:05 +0800
From:	Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
CC:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Surbhi Palande <csurbhi@...il.com>,
	Valerie Aurora <val@...consulting.com>,
	Christopher Chaltain <christopher.chaltain@...onical.com>,
	"Peter M. Petrakis" <peter.petrakis@...onical.com>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] VFS: Rename and refactor writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle

On thu, 8 Dec 2011 10:04:34 -0800, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
>  /**
> - * writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle	-	start writeback if none underway
> + * try_to_writeback_inodes_sb_nr	-	start writeback if none underway
>   * @sb: the superblock
>   * @nr: the number of pages to write
>   *
>   * Invoke writeback_inodes_sb if no writeback is currently underway.
>   * Returns 1 if writeback was started, 0 if not.
>   */
> -int writeback_inodes_sb_nr_if_idle(struct super_block *sb,
> +int try_to_writeback_inodes_sb_nr(struct super_block *sb,
>  				   unsigned long nr,
>  				   enum wb_reason reason)
>  {
>  	if (!writeback_in_progress(sb->s_bdi)) {
>  		down_read(&sb->s_umount);
> -		writeback_inodes_sb_nr(sb, nr, reason);
> +		if (nr == 0)
> +			writeback_inodes_sb(sb, reason);
> +		else
> +			writeback_inodes_sb_nr(sb, nr, reason);
>  		up_read(&sb->s_umount);
>  		return 1;
>  	} else
>  		return 0;

The comment said "Returns 1 if writeback was started", so if writeback_in_progress()
return true, I think this function also should return 1.

BTW: Does anyone know when this patchset will be merged into the main tree?

Thanks
Miao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/