[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1323748626.2583.41.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 04:57:06 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: zhihua che <zhihua.che@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [Slub allocator] There are chances that
kmem_cache_cpu->freelist gets lost if the process happens to be rescheduled
to a differenet cpu before the local_irq_save() completes in __slab_alloc()
Le lundi 12 décembre 2011 à 18:39 +0100, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Le lundi 12 décembre 2011 à 09:50 -0600, Christoph Lameter a écrit :
>
> > Correct. Issue was introduced in 2.6.39.
> >
> > Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> >
>
> Indeed, I reproduced the leak with hackbench and lot of threads.
>
> Thanks
>
> [PATCH] slub: fix a possible memleak in __slab_alloc()
>
> Zhihua Che reported a possible memleak in slub allocator on
> CONFIG_PREEMPT=y builds.
>
> It is possible current thread migrates right before disabling irqs in
> __slab_alloc(). We must check again c->freelist, and perform a normal
> allocation instead of scratching c->freelist.
>
> Many thanks to Zhihua Che for spotting this bug, introduced in 2.6.39
>
> Reported-by: zhihua che <zhihua.che@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> CC: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
> CC: stable@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> mm/slub.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index ed3334d..923d238 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2166,6 +2166,12 @@ redo:
> goto new_slab;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> + object = c->freelist;
> + if (object)
> + goto load_freelist;
> +#endif
> +
> stat(s, ALLOC_SLOWPATH);
>
> do {
>
Thinking again about the issue, I believe its not a CONFIG_PREEMPT only
one.
We can be interrupted and the IRQ handler can free an object an populate
freelist too. So the check must always be done.
Thanks
[PATCH v2] slub: fix a possible memleak in __slab_alloc()
Zhihua Che reported a possible memleak in slub allocator on
CONFIG_PREEMPT=y builds.
It is possible current thread migrates right before disabling irqs in
__slab_alloc(). We must check again c->freelist, and perform a normal
allocation instead of scratching c->freelist.
Many thanks to Zhihua Che for spotting this bug, introduced in 2.6.39
V2: Its also possible an IRQ freed one (or several) object(s) and
populated c->freelist, so its not a CONFIG_PREEMPT only problem.
Reported-by: zhihua che <zhihua.che@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
CC: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
---
mm/slub.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index ed3334d..1a919f0 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2166,6 +2166,11 @@ redo:
goto new_slab;
}
+ /* must check again c->freelist in case of cpu migration or IRQ */
+ object = c->freelist;
+ if (object)
+ goto load_freelist;
+
stat(s, ALLOC_SLOWPATH);
do {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists