linux-kernel - Re: printk() vs tty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1323855797.28489.22.camel@twins>
Date:	Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:43:17 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: printk() vs tty_io

On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 07:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> btw., would be nice to also somehow realeasify those debug hacks 
> to preserve them for eternity - doing all lockdep output as 
> earlyprintk while keeping printks working is a great way to 
> debug printk() itself.
> 
> Those printk lockups also took a *lot* of time for me to bisect.

Yeah, they're horrible.. took me long enough to reproduce, and even now
I know how its not easy.

Anyway, I just posted the two patches that make lockdep do
early_printk(), they're not too horrid. I still need to look at making
dump_stack() play nice as well, but so far I've managed to grok bits
from the held lock output only.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/