[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111214100338.GA18348@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:03:38 +0100
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>,
Bill Gatliff <bgat@...lgatliff.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
Ryan Mallon <ryan@...ewatersys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PWM: add pwm framework support
* Sascha Hauer wrote:
> I have a branch which adds a basic PWM framework. It doesn't change the
> pwm API at all, but only adds support for registering multiple PWM
> drivers. All in Kernel drivers are converted to this new framework, but
> except the i.MX driver all of them are untested. I'm quite confident
> that the drivers itself work, but there will probably be some Kconfig
> related issues which I wasn't able to sort out. The corresponding
> Maintainers should probably have a look over it. Feel free to post
> the patches if you are prepared to work on the comments you receive.
> Otherwise I'll see if I find some time maybe next week.
[...]
I've looked at this in more detail and one thing that irritates me is that
the current driver API requires a driver to register a pwm_chip structure for
each PWM it can control. Wouldn't it be easier in such cases to just specify
how many PWMs a chip wants to register, much like gpiolib does it?
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists