[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111214104308.14d0500c@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:43:08 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: printk() vs tty_io
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:52:35 -0800
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > I've been poking at reducing the constraints on printk(), like make it
> > work under rq->lock etc..
>
> You aren't supposed register a console that wakes things up. But the
> only console that honors that afaik is the traditional vt console.
> *Maybe* the network console, I didn't check.
Serial console tries to be good as does netconsole. Serial USB console
can't so just does its best.
Not sure about some of the DRM framebuffer ones either.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists