[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EE8B78F.9090104@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:49:51 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ibm.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, arnd@...db.de, ryanh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com, levinsasha928@...il.com,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 V5] Avoid soft lockup message when KVM is stopped
by host
On 12/14/2011 08:39 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 12/14/2011 02:16 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>> Having this controlled from userspace means it doesn't work for SIGSTOP
>>> or for long scheduling delays. What about doing this automatically
>>> based on preempt notifiers?
>>
>> Long scheduling delays should be considered hangups from the guest
>> perspective.
>
> Why? To the guest it looks like slow hardware, but it will interpret it
> as a softlockup.
>
>> About SIGSTOP, that is a corner case. Unsure if its even properly supported
>> by QEMU.
>
> It works from my experience.
We don't adjust vm_clock's offset on SIGSTOP/SIGCONT so while it may appear to
work okay, QEMU isn't exhibiting the behavior it is supposed to.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists