linux-kernel - Re: Sparc-32 doesn't work in 3.1.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20111214.125443.973289484729064945.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:54:43 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	slyich@...il.com
Cc:	rob@...dley.net, aboriginal@...ts.landley.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, jakub@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Sparc-32 doesn't work in 3.1.

From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 20:42:25 +0300

> It forces compiler to geterate "usual" pattern for relocation.

No, this is wrong.

The right fix is to simply teach btfixup to be able to patch
the 'restore' just as equally as it would patch an 'or'.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/