linux-kernel - Re: Sparc-32 doesn't work in 3.1.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20111214.141316.931101347023790867.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:13:16 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	slyich@...il.com
Cc:	rob@...dley.net, aboriginal@...ts.landley.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, jakub@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Sparc-32 doesn't work in 3.1.

From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:55:16 +0300

>> sparc32: Be less strict in matching %lo part of relocation.
>> 
>> The "(insn & 0x01800000) != 0x01800000" test matches 'restore'
>> but that is a legitimate place to see the %lo() part of a 32-bit
>> symbol relocation, particularly in tail calls.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> 
> Tested-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@...too.org>
> 
> Was about to send exactly the same. Thanks!

Thanks for testing Sergei.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/