[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111214191739.GA14693@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 20:17:39 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>,
serge.hallyn@...onical.com, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
gkurz@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mtk.manpages@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][V4] Add reboot_pid_ns to handle the reboot syscall
On 12/13, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > --- a/kernel/sys.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sys.c
> > @@ -444,6 +444,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(reboot, int, magic1, int, magic2, unsigned int, cmd,
> > magic2 != LINUX_REBOOT_MAGIC2C))
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > + if (task_active_pid_ns(current) != &init_pid_ns)
> > + return reboot_pid_ns(task_active_pid_ns(current), cmd);
> > +
> > /* Instead of trying to make the power_off code look like
> > * halt when pm_power_off is not set do it the easy way.
> > */
>
> I'll repeat my cruelly-ignored review comment for v3:
>
> This adds a bunch of useless code if CONFIG_PID_NS=n.
Agreed.
> It would be
> better to do
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PID_NS
> extern void pidns_handle_reboot(int cmd);
> #else
> static inline void pidns_handle_reboot(int cmd)
> {
> }
> #endif
Can't resist.
Why the kernel always prefers to do it this way, adding the ugly
do-nothing inlines?
Isn't it better to simply call pidns_handle_reboot(cmd) under
CONFIG_PID_NS in sys_reboot() ?
#ifdef CONFIG_PID_NS
if (task_active_pid_ns(current) != &init_pid_ns)
return reboot_pid_ns(cmd);
#endif
This way, if you look at sys_reboot() you can immediately see what
happens, no need to inspect the !CONFIG_PID_NS definition. Plus this
doesn't add the "unnecesary" entry into tag file.
OK, </flame> ;)
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists